The Best Teams I've Coached Weren't the Most Talented Ones
Ask most people what wins games and they'll say talent. Skill. The player who can take three defenders on and still finish top corner.
While that is an exciting moment, that's not what I've seen when it comes to the best teams. Those highlights look great for the player. Those stats and points are great on paper. But, has this really given the team the best chance of success though? Or does this put the team in a lower situation because of the individual goals they have set for themselves and how they treat their teammates?
The best teams I've ever been part of weren't the most talented rosters I've coached. They were the ones that actually believed in each other. And the worst teams I've coached, some of them stacked with talent on paper, were the ones with one thing in common: a cancer nobody dealt with.
Talent Loses to Togetherness More Than People Admit
A team full of individually gifted players who don't trust each other will lose to a team of average players who do. Not sometimes, but consistently. Because soccer isn't eleven solo performances stitched together. It's eleven people who have to make a decision, over and over, ninety minutes at a time. "Do I trust the player next to me enough to make the pass, make the run, cover the space they're vacating."
Take that trust away and you don't have a team. You have eleven individuals wearing the same shirt hoping talent covers for the gap.
The Inspiration at the Pro Level Take a look at some of the best teams to do it. Of course I am going to talk about The Arsenal Invincible's. Without a doubt the best team the Premier League has ever seen. The likes of Thierry Henry, Robert Pires, Dennis Bergkamp, Patrick Vierra, and many others. It was a culture that Arsene Wenger created in the squad. He knew what he had and the season before said that the team has the potential to go unbeaten in a season. Going unbeaten in an entire league season?
You have to have players who know they would do whatever the team needed and not complain. If you were a sub, you knew your role. If you were a starter, you knew that you could easily be changed out if you were not doing what the team needed. Matches were over in the tunnel before a ball was even kicked. It was intimidation from the belief that the squad had for one another.
Other unbelievable squads include Real Madrid in the Champion's League, AC Milan in the early 2000s, United's treble winning squad, Bayern Munich, and of course Leicester's underdog season in the Prem. The list can go on for great teams who did things the right way.
Talent is a starting point, not a result
Talented players often get by early on ability alone. They're rarely asked to work for a touch, a tackle, or a place in the team. When the level rises and ability stops being enough, the players who've never had to figure things out are the ones who struggle most.
The players who weren't the best at twelve have usually spent years solving problems. They've learned to listen, to adjust, to compete for every ball. That habit is worth more than any single skill
What a Cancer Actually Looks Like
It's rarely as obvious as people expect. A cancer on a team doesn't usually show up screaming in the parking lot or on the field.
It looks like:
The player who only brings energy when the cameras or college coaches are around
The sideways comment about a teammate's mistake, said just loud enough to be heard
The body language that says "not my fault" before the ball even goes out of bounds
The kid who's good enough that everyone quietly agrees to let it slide
The player who doesn't clap or celebrate someone else's success
The player that drags everyone down around them off the field if the coach corrects them
That last two are the most dangerous. Talent buys tolerance. And tolerance is how a small problem becomes a team wide one.
I've Had to Make This Call
I've sat talented players for a game, not for a tactical reason, but because what they were doing to the group in training mattered more than what they could do for us on match day. It wasn't a popular decision in the moment. It was the right one. Even after dealing with parents about the situation.
Because the message a team hears when a coach lets a cancer slide is louder than anything said in a team talk. It says talent buys you a pass on how you treat people. The best team environments that have been built only happened after that message got corrected, sometimes the hard way.
What Belief Actually Builds
A team that genuinely believes in each other plays differently. You can see it before you can measure it. Players make the extra run because they trust it'll get rewarded, not ignored. A mistake gets a shoulder tap instead of a look. Someone has an off day and the group compensates instead of piling on.
None of that shows up in a highlight reel. All of it shows up during the playoffs/national championships, when the games get hard and talent alone stops being enough.
Growth Requires a Clean Environment
You can't develop players in a toxic atmosphere. Development requires risk, trying the pass that might not come off, attempting the move that might get you embarrassed, and then receiving some love knowing that everything will be ok after a mistake. Players won't take those risks in front of teammates or coaches who'll make them regret it. Seeing that teammate react negatively if someone makes a mistake does more harm than they think in that moment.
That goes on both sides of the sideline though. The parent sideline carries a lot of weight that effects the entire squad. Imagine attempting to create a standard for the team culture and it all being thrown out because of that car ride home. Or those moments on the way to the match about how players shouldn't trust a certain player or even their coach because of the parents opinion who only has an outside perspective.
Now listen, coaches are toxic too. Some are extremely toxic. But when you have someone who is doing it for the players and not the club/themselves, then you have to trust in that actual process. Some parents enjoy being the center of attention by coaching and making negative comments on the sideline. The reports that I get from other parents about certain sideline cancers can be demoralizing, but as a coach we must do our best to keep the pressure on you and not the players. You usually start to see those negative parents off by themselves with no one around or even worse when they are able to recruit additional nay sayers that add fuel to a toxic environment.
A clean team environment isn't about everyone being best friends. It's about everyone knowing the group has their back when they take a chance and it doesn't work out. Take that safety away and players shrink. They stop trying the hard thing. They start playing not to be criticized instead of playing to get better. Which is where their development stops.
What those teams had instead
Looking back, the best groups I've coached shared the same few things. None of them show up on a tryout sheet.
They were coachable Correction landed as information, not criticism. A player who can hear "not like that, like this" and try it again immediately will pass a more gifted player who can't.
They held each other accountable
The standard didn't only come from me. Players called out a lazy run or a missed session themselves and celebrated each other's effort just as loudly.
They played for each other
The fourteenth player mattered as much as the first. When everyone believes their role counts, the whole team runs further and fights harder for one another.
They enjoyed being together
It sounds simple, but it's everything. Players who want to be around their teammates show up early, stay late, and train harder without being asked.
Final Thought
Talent gets a team noticed. Togetherness gets a team somewhere.
If you're building a team and you have to choose between the more talented option and the one who makes the group better, choose the group. Every time. History will not only remember certain moments of playing, but more so how that player/coach made the group feel. What will you be remembered for?
Comments